
The Agos newspaper, one of the publications of Turkey’s Armenian community that mostly publishes in Turkish, has begun to increasingly adopt the discourse of the fanatic members of the Armenian diaspora ever since the murder of the newspaper’s founder and chief editor Hrant Dink. An example that can be given for this transformation is the Turkish-language commentary series titled “Ararat'ın Öte Yanı” (“the Other Side of Ararat”) that is published in the said newspaper.[1] These commentaries address the current political developments in Armenia. The problem with these Turkish-language commentaries has to do with their title; instead of using the Turkish name “Ağrı”, they use its Armenian counterpart; “Ararat”. While one might initially think that using the foreign-language name of something (in this case, a mountain in Turkey) instead of its Turkish name does not mean much, it should not be forgotten that names have powerful psychological impacts on both individuals and societies.
Ağrı Mountain (also referred to as Mount Ararat in English) holds an important in place in Armenian ethno-nationalist discourse (it should be kept in mind that Ağrı Mountain looks very impressive from Armenia’s capital Yerevan). Indeed, according to some accounts, Ağrı Mountain is one of most important symbols of the Armenian people. As such, according Armenian ethno-nationalists, Ağrı Mountain and the “Western Armenia” region (the name Armenian ethno-nationalists use when referring to Turkey’s eastern parts) that encompasses this mountain must be “taken back” in the future. However, Anatolia is the homeland of the Turks. A neighboring country claiming and seeking to “take back” these lands on which Turkish people live points to the existence of an unhealthy mindset disconnected from reality.
At the same time, it should be indicated that Ağrı Mountain and all of Anatolia is the common heritage of all Turkish citizens, including those of Armenian descent.
As such, by insisting on emphasizing the name “Ararat” -the Armenian-language counterpart of the name “Ağrı”- in its Turkish publication, Agos is rejecting a common heritage of Turkey and is instead pointing towards the discriminatory and destructive discourse of certain fanatical Armenian groups.
This fanatical mindset and the danger it represents should not be underestimated, since it finds adherents even in the upper echelons of power. For example, during an event attended by the youth in 2011, former President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan had this to say upon hearing the question “will we be able to take back our western lands [Eastern Anatolia/“Western Armenia”] along with Mount Ararat?”:
“This is up to your generation. My generation, for example, successfully fulfilled its own duty. In the 90’s, we rescued a part of our homeland, Artsakh [the Nagorno-Karabakh region belonging to Azerbaijan], from the hands of the enemy. Every generation has a duty [to fulfill]. Whether your generation will be able to fulfill its duty as we had done will be up to your unity and solidarity…”[2]
These words uttered by the president of a neighboring country regarding lands belonging to Turkey lays bare the hostility some foreign Armenian groups have towards Turkey. With its emphasis on “Ararat”, Agos is placing itself either knowingly or unknowingly in the same camp as those who espouse this hostile attitude.
[1] For the latest example, please see: Alin Ozinian, “ARARAT'IN ÖTE YANI/ Paşinyan’dan taktik istifa,” Agos, 3 Ekim 2018, http://www.agos.com.tr/tr/yazi/21346/ararat-in-ote-yani-pasinyandan-taktik-istifa
[2] Nerdun Hacıoğlu, “Karabağ’ı biz aldık Ağrı’yı size bıraktık,” Hürriyet, 26 Temmuz 2011, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/karabag-i-biz-aldik-agri-yi-size-biraktik-18338718
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
CONCERNS OVER THE PATRIARCH ELECTION
AVİM 07.07.2017 -
AVIM HELD MEETINGS WITH THINK TANKS AND ACADEMIC CIRCLES IN TEHRAN
AVİM 17.09.2015 -
RUPEN SEVAG CHILINGIRIAN
AVİM 09.03.2020 -
ARCHITECTS OF DENIAL: THE LATEST CINEMATOGRAPHIC EFFORTS OF THE ARMENIAN LOBBY
AVİM 12.10.2017 -
THE CLAIMS AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SIGNED AT ANKARA, 25 OCTOBER 1934 AND ITS LEGALLY BINDING IMPACT ON COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF US CITIZENS OF ARMENIAN DESCENT
AVİM 14.01.2020
-
TAIWAN (REPUBLIC OF CHINA) COULD BE SIGNIFICANT IN TURKEY’S OPENING TO ASIA.
Alev KILIÇ 07.11.2013 -
THE EUROPEAN UNION'S SHAMEFUL CAMPS CONTINUE TO EXIST DESPITE THE FIRE DISASTER
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 30.09.2020 -
THE POPE AND GERMANY SELECTIVE OF TRAGEDIES, POLITICAL ANALYST SAYS
MERVE AYDOĞAN 14.05.2015 -
MURAD OF SEBASTIA (SIVAS) - A LESSER KNOWN ARMENIAN FEDAYEE MOSTLY PORTRAYED BY A FEW, HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE SOURCES
Ahmet Can ÖKTEM 29.04.2022 -
POPE FRANCIS’ DOUBLE STANDARD – II
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 28.06.2015
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"