
AVIM
22 JUNE 2015
Three Turkish citizens of Armenian descent were elected as a member of parliament at the recent general elections.
It is understood that all three of them share the same opinion that the events of 1915 constitute genocide, although two of the parties of which they are a member have a different opinion on the matter. A large majority of the Turkish public opinion reject genocide allegations; some even believe that these allegations are an insult to the Turks.
Nevertheless, no one questions the fact that Armenians were elected as members of the parliament. Although they will face some opposition when they voice these genocide allegations both inside and outside the parliament, their attitude will not affect their position as MPs or their party memberships since they will be using their freedom of expression being chosen by the will of the people.
However, this cannot be said for every country. In Belgium, a country which is claimed to respect democracy in every sense, Mahinur Özdemir, a MP of Turkish origin elected from the Brussels region, was expelled from her party for not characterizing the events of 1915 as genocide despite all kinds of pressure. Furthermore, there was not much opposition to the party’s decision. One has to ask: if she had been a non-Turk or a non-Muslim, would she have been exposed to the same treatment?
One cannot help but wonder: Who is more democratic? Who respects freedom of expression more?
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
PRESIDENT SARGSYAN’S RESPONSE TO THE INVITATION FOR THE COMMEMORATION CEREMONIES OF THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BATTLE OF GALLIPOLI
AVİM 20.01.2015 -
“THE ARMENIAN NARRATIVE” IN SYRIA: HOW RELIABLE IS IT?
AVİM 30.01.2019 -
ARMENIA IS ON THE RIGHT TRACK
AVİM 14.05.2024 -
A LOOK INTO THE YEAR 2025
AVİM 02.01.2025 -
THE HUMANITARIAN APPROACH AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE IDENTITY OF THE ROHINGYA SHOULD NOT BE SEPARABLE
AVİM 06.12.2017
-
PARADOXICAL COOPERATION: CSTO MEMBER ARMENIA CONDUCTS MILITARY EXERCISES WITH NATO
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 21.04.2015 -
BRIBE? A NEW LIABILITY? ARMENIA’S NEW ISKANDER MISSILES
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 25.10.2016 -
THE AFTERMATH OF THE DENIAL OF TERRORIST SASSOUNIAN’S PAROLE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 16.05.2017 -
ARMENIA: THE TOOL OF POPULISM IN THE FRENCH ELECTIONS
Tutku DİLAVER 07.01.2022 -
THE POPE AND GERMANY SELECTIVE OF TRAGEDIES, POLITICAL ANALYST SAYS
MERVE AYDOĞAN 14.05.2015
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"